In the middle of February, the Israeli Security Cabinet agreed
unanimously that Hamas must free kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Shalit
before Israel will agree to another ceasefire, release any prisoners, or
open Gaza crossings to commercial traffic.
The decision put the ball back into Hamas’ court. The Gaza-based
terrorist group has insisted the soldier, who was kidnapped on June 25,
2006, will remain in captivity until Israel agrees to their terms for
another truce. They are demanding hundreds—some say thousands—of
terrorists in Israeli prisons, many responsible for Jewish deaths, as
well as the opening of the border crossings into Gaza.
The Israeli government and Hamas, through Egyptian mediators, agreed
last June to a ceasefire that was supposed to lead to Mr. Shalit’s
release.
Hamas, however, immediately broke the truce with rocket and mortar
shells fired at civilian targets in the Negev.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert refused to retaliate until this past
November when rockets reached increasingly closer to Tel Aviv.
Patrol Borders
For its part, last month, Hamas presented Israel with a new demand of
its own, one of dozens twists and turns by the terrorists over the past
two years. This latest demand, that the Jewish state help patrol the
border with Egypt as a new condition for the freedom of Mr. Shalit, is
the latest of dozens of twists and turns by the terrorist organization
and the Olmert government over the past two and a half years.
Gaza-based Hamas political advisor Ahmed Yousef revealed the new
demand to WorldNetDaily. Several hours earlier, Khaled Mashaal, the
Syrian-based overall head of Hamas, contradicted reports that Gaza
officials had agreed to a demand by outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
that the soldier be freed before another ceasefire pact is announced.
Just after Mr. Shalit was kidnapped, Israeli Prime Minister Olmert
told the Cabinet: "Everyone knows that capitulating to terrorism today
means inviting the next act of terrorism. We will not do this."
Several days later, he told Jewish leaders in Jerusalem, "This is not
a matter of negotiations. Release of prisoners is absolutely not on the
agenda of the Israeli government.";
No Red Cross
Since his son’s capture, Mr. Shalit’s parents have met with many
world leaders, none of whom have even succeeded in persuading the
International Red Cross to demand that Hamas honor the Geneva Convention
and allow Red Cross officials to visit Gilad Shalit.
Most Israelis recognize that, painful as it is, relinquishing Mr.
Shalit will leave Hamas without its strongest trump card, which the
terrorists has played to the hilt. The soldier’s parents, backed by
dovish groups, have appealed almost daily for the government to "pay
whatever price Hamas names" and end their son’s ordeal.
Exploiting
Hamas leaders and spokesmen have exploited the Israeli media as well
as the Shalit family’s psychological duress. The terrorists frequently
change their demands, and then accuse the Israeli government of not
concluding an agreement.
Last month, Israel’s Channel One Mabat’s news program showed
political leaders from the conservative National Union party who warned
that no one can say he "did not spill blood" if he approves releasing
murderers. They pointed out that many previously released terrorists
have returned to continue killing Israelis.
Asked by Israeli television to respond, Noam Shalit said his family
"understands the pain" of terror victims and that "no one is right" on
the entire issue.
No Talks
Asked if he is involved in indirect talks with Hamas, Mr. Shalit said
no.
However, he said, he has demanded that no Israeli leader make peace
with the Palestinians without producing Gilad.
Gilad Shalit is believed to be alive and well, although the Almagor
Terror Victims Association director Meir Indor has expressed fears that
the soldier may be suffering from Stockholm syndrome," in which the
victim adopts the cause of his captors.
The Jewish Voice and Opinion is a politically conservative Jewish
publication which present news and feature articles not generally
available elsewhere in the Jewish or secular media. Articles may be
reprinted in their entirety with attribution.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]